It is the most portable (being the lightest) and is generally the cheapest. Why use such a time-consuming means of attachment? Thats because of their aperture. To completely overcome false color you need a considerably more expensive apochromatic refractor or a reflector. This is the simplest form of mounting and is particularly suitable for a beginners instrument. https://www.NexStarSite.com. ==>Click Here To Check TheCelestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZsPricing On Amazon! Boasting a whopping 10-inch aperture, the Celestron Starsense Explorer 10 Dobsonian is a beast of a telescope. Particularly under dark skies, bright nebulae like Orion and the Lagoon look great, but planetary nebulae such as the Cats Eye are really too small and dim to be interesting in the 102. Users of the Explorer have found it to be a very capable device and quite easy to set up. Which eyepieces would you suggest to replace those less-than-ideal ones that come with the Stars Sense 130? will also probably upgrade in 5 years or so. It has a memory card but it cant help you to take pictures. This telescope was a huge investment for Someone like myself. The StarSense Explorer DX 102 includes two 1.25" eyepieces: a 25mm "Super" Konig providing 26x and a 10mm Konig providing 65x. With the tripod attached the length would be 1.24 metres too. If youre interested in other refractor systems, maybe due to the slightly inferior light gathering abilities of the 102AZ, this list may be helpful. Compare Celestron StarSense Explorer vs Celestron NexStar 130 SLT vs Celestron 130 vs Celestron DX 102AZ . It has more magnification power than dx 102az. Rather, the mount uses an adapter and the computing power of your smartphone to help you find your way around the sky, which well get to after covering the basics of the telescope(s) itself. The other advantage is that no power source is needed. However, there are some key differences between them. This means we may make a commission if you purchase an item using one of our links*. I had what seemed to be a related question, which has come up somewhat in that main thread: whether to purchase the DX 130AZ vs 102AZ? at Amazon. There is an issue though in that if you are using your smartphone attached to the telescope to use the StarSense technology then you wont be able to attach it to the eyepiece to take a photo at the same time. The instrument is computerized, making use of the observer's smartphone and free-to-download StarSense Explorer app to make navigating the night sky and exploring solar system (opens in new tab) and bright deep-sky objects such as nebulas, star clusters and galaxies (opens in new tab) fun and, above all, a breeze to find. We may earn commissions by recommending products on this website. A 6mm gold-line eyepiece will provide 108x with the StarSense Explorer DX 102, which is near the upper bounds of what the optics of this telescope can handle. For further details on these telescopes, you can also check outCelestrons website. This is not to be confused with smartphone attachments that simply enable you to take photos of bright objects through the eyepiece, as found on some other beginners instruments. There are four instruments in the Celestron StarSense Explorer range: an 80 mm refractor, a 114 mm reflector, the 102 mm refractor under test, and a 130 mm reflector. Due to an a enclosed tube being used, the optics wont need to be cleaned or collimated all the time. Apparently, they both go with dx 102az and 130 az. *This post may contain affiliate links. But with eight different models, which is right for you? . Normally, this is done for astrophotography to avoid performing a time-consuming GoTo alignment and is only used to find one target. You can upgrade your telescope set up later with some Barlow and Plossl eyepieces. The Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ is an achromatic refractor, with a 102 mm doublet lens composed of two different types of glass. It has a focal ratio of f/6.5, which means that it has a . Ultimately, due to the somewhat inferior nature of the phones used (at least when compared to a GoTo Computerised Mount) the field of view will only be limited to a max of 0.25 degrees (half the width of the moon). Thanks! Celestron StarSense Explorer Guide For Beginners No, your phone cant take pictures while using the Starsense app. How Do The Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZsOptics Work? The DX 102 includes a 1.25 Amici prism star diagonal, which is mostly plastic and has some issues with glare and a diffraction spike on bright targets. EASY TO SET UP AND USE: Manual altazimuth mount with smooth, dual-axis slow-motion controls makes it easy to follow the on-screen arrows to your desired target. After a career that included making telescopes and editing a photography magazine, he became an author of popular astronomy books including Complete Guide to Stargazing, 101 Things to Spot in the Night Sky and Night Sky Atlas. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. A star diagonal is standard with astronomical refractors and reflects the beam from the focuser through 90 degrees to allow a much easier observing position than crouching on the ground looking up through the tube, but usually, it has the drawback of reversing the image as in an ordinary mirror. It has one 25mm Kellner eyepiece with 26x magnification power. The 80 mm model is the smallest with the weakest viewing capacity, and the 254 mm model is the largest with the best. Its focal length is about 650 mm. A 2 diagonal and eyepieces would allow for a wider field of view, but are expensive and would make the scope unable to properly balance on its mount, as well as straining the lightweight mount and tripod. The StarSense has an Aperture of 102mm, a focal length of 650mm resulting in a focal ratio of just under f/6.5. Youre at the right place. You can unsubscribe at any time. This helps remove much of the frustration that can occur when starting with astronomy that it is too hard and takes too long to find things to look at. Thanks to your phones limited battery life and computing power, the StarSense Explorer technology obviously cant take a new picture of the sky every time you move the telescope. I am sorry but I have zero knowledge on this so please excuse my raw language ! But youll find the images quite sharp. In practice, this system is limited to an accuracy of a bit better 0.25 degrees, or half the width of a full moon. Some of the Celestron Astromaster telescopes use similar OTAs (telescope tubes) and similar AZ mounts. Celestrons StarSense Explorer line of telescopes are some of the newest, and arguably most innovative telescopes on the market, and the newest effort of Celestron to make using a telescope as easy as possible. This is more powerful than the models above and will provide better views. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. The method of alignment is to aim the telescope at a chosen object which is where the red-dot finder comes in handy and then move the red crosswires on the app to the same object shown on the phone view. This mount is a little on the small side for either optical tube, but it works just fine. The eyepieces are supplied with tight plastic covers and how many beginners will try to twist these off, rather than prise them off? Best regards, Thanks so much in advance. Celestron StarSense Explorer DX100AZ vs. DX 102AZ So, it doesnt require collimation or cleaning. Just recently purchased DX130. These eyepieces have a lot of plastic in their build, but use glass optics and are fairly sharp, with more eye relief than a typical Plossl ocular (particularly beneficial with the 10mm). The reason why this is a problem is because simply adjusting the axis to allow for a more smooth motion may take anywhere from 30 minutes to an hour to do. I'm new to astronomy and have previously only spent a couple of hours playing around with a 60mm refractor from a thrift store (have been able to find planets, and haven't looked for much else). Amazon.com : Celestron - StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ Smartphone App-Enabled Telescope - Works with StarSense App to Help You Find Stars, Planets & More . The model I tested is the Explorer DX 102AZ refractor telescope ($400). Before the main discussion, lets see the fundamental difference between both telescopes. The StarSense Explorer utilises the oldest telescopic optics out of the 3 main categories currently around called refractor optics. The new Celestron StarSense Explorer telescopes use your smartphone to make it much easier to find planets, galaxies, and other objects to look at. So all that is left is light gathering. StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ vs 102AZ - posted in Celestron Computerized Telescopes: Hi all, Ive been following the StarSense Explorer main thread, which has a lot of great information and seems particularly targeted towards adapting the bracket/mirror towards other telescopes. Stargazing Help is a participant in Amazon Associates program. The package comes with two eyepieces, giving two useful magnifications of 26x and 66x, and what is termed an erect-image diagonal. Mostly Astromaster and Powerseekers. These eyepieces have a lot of plastic in their build, but use glass optics and are fairly sharp, with more eye relief than a typical Plossl ocular (particularly beneficial with the 10mm). HIGH-QUALITY 102MM REFRACTOR: Fully coated glass optics provide bright, sharp, clear views of craters on the Moon, Jupiter, Saturn, Mars, and deep sky objects like the Orion Nebula, Andromeda Galaxy, and Pleiades Open Star Cluster. Although the Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ didn't make into our list of the best telescopes (opens in new tab) for 2021, it's still an excellent piece of kit for those just starting out in skywatching, especially those who are hunting for an all-inclusive package that's easy to use and makes navigating the night sky a breeze. I'm interested in spending perhaps an hour or so every week or two doing astronomy. This model and the 102 AZ are refractors. Dx 130 on the other hand weighs about 8.16 kg. Mars dark spots can be seen, although barely, when the planet is close to Earth, while its polar ice caps are a little more obvious. The erect-image diagonal (which is necessary to allow the instrument to focus) introduces very little distortion, only marginally noticeable on a star image using a magnification of 130x. It doesnt have issues like chromatic aberration like the dx 102az. This is much less precise than a real GoTo system with tracking but much simpler, easier, and more reliable than a motorized telescope. The Celestron StarSense DX 102AZ features a doublet lens composed of two different types of glass, offering bright views of targets. Each is different but they all feature the StarSense Explorer technology that provides a great halfway point between computerized (GOTO) telescopes and manual ones (see FAQs below if you want more information on GOTO telescopes). One major source of problems is the mirror that is crucial to finding objects. Generally, refractors are less bulky and easier to operate. Similar cost. However, the system has a few notable limitations that could curtail observing sessions. Can you explain how they are still about equal in light gathering? Would one model be a better purchase vs the other? As for what the app provides, they have database of a few hundred celestial objects so not bad for a beginner getting involved with this hobby. These views will be much brighter and clearer with the larger aperture models. $479.95. Youll be able to see Andromeda and other galaxies. I am trying to get my 9 Year old interested in this and the only reason why I was considering the 130 was because of the Star sense app which makes it super easy to find deep space objects and galaxies. We previously complained about the lack of targets in the apps database, but Celestron has updated the app and drastically expanded its number of objects, greatly increasing its overall utility. Any tips would be greatly appreciated, otherwise, I may have to send my scope back. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Today's best Celestron StarSense DX 102AZ deals, We check over 250 million products every day for the best prices, Today's best Celestron 31145 NexStar 130 SLT Series Newtonian Reflector Telescope deals, Today's best Celestron NexStar 102SLT Computerized Telescope deals. I have two young kids (between 5-10 years old) and would like to try and get them interested. If you disregard factors like size and portability, then the Celestron Starsense Explorer 10 Dobsonian is the best as it has the highest aperture and will provide the best views. Therefore this makes for a real (relative) bargain and a great option. Celestron Starsense explorer dx 130az uses Newtonian reflector type optics. So, what is so special about the Celestron dx eyepieces? Open star clusters look great and benefit from the 102AZs wide field of view, but globular star clusters are little more than fuzzy balls. Heres how it works. Celestron dx 102az comes with two 1.25 eyepieces. This is necessary when aligning the telescope, as you need to point it at a recognizable object at the start of observing. We're pleased to report that loading and using the software on our Moto G8 phone was easy and quite intuitive. So, there are issues of ghosting and internal reflection. If you prefer a smaller refractor, then the 102AZ below could work but will almost certainly cost more. The downside is that it is generally more expensive. Out of the three types it is identified as having refractor-type optics. All of this requires some user input namely the date and time, the location, and choosing the stars. Heavy and large. Its focal length is about 650 mm. One 10mm Kellner and one 25mm Kellner eyepiece. The downside is that it is generally in the higher budget range and that it is less portable, heavier, and bulkier. Their Starsense explorer has been quite popular among stargazing beginners. Before the purchase, be sure to install the StarSense Explorer app on your phone. Get the StarSense Explorer; it has better accessories and is easier to use, Ive had my 130 for so long. They wont find things automatically for you, but they will search for what you can see and guide you to look at whatever planet or object you want to look at. Now since the Dobsonian does not have an app how difficult does it become to locate objects ? Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ 102mm f/6.5 AZ 22460 B&H These are very average specs and maybe even subpar when you consider reflector telescopes tend to offer a lot more bang for the buck nevertheless, the specs should be competent for beginners. They are generally more expensive though. There is no reason at all to get the StarSense Explorer LT 114AZ. Any additional thoughts you have to sesparate the two? ), Why Is Jupiter Denser Than Saturn? You can even watch faint celestial objects with it. UNLEASH THE POWER OF YOUR SMARTPHONE: Let your iPhone or Android phone take you on a guided tour of the night skyno telescope experience required. Galaxies, nebulaes, star clusters and large parts of the messier should be viewable although there may be issues showing accurate colours with some stars. Unlike Celestrons other computer-assisted offerings, the StarSense Explorer telescopes have no motors. Celestrons specs say 11% obstruction by area, so the 130 loses 1460 of area = 11813, still bigger than the 102. Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102 AZ Review (Refractor) Instead, it occasionally uses plate-solving technology when you first set up the telescope or move it across a significant portion of the sky, then tries its best to extrapolate finer movements using your phones relatively inaccurate gyroscope and accelerometer. The alternative equatorial mounting, which has one of its axes tilted at the same angle as your latitude, not only confuses the wits out of many beginners but has a drawback in that it involves an overhanging load usually balanced with a counterweight, reducing the portability. The 130 mm (5-inch) aperture is fairly large and will enable great views of planets and deep-sky objects when the night sky conditions are right. The Celestron Starsense explorer dx 102az telescope uses one of the oldest types of telescope optics. Im still figuring out, between Starsense Explorer DX130 and LT127. The Celestron Omni XLT 150 is available here but is priced way above my budget. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); Stargazing Help came into existence when some young minds got mesmerized by outer space while camping. Since both are beginner-level telescopes, comparison comes to mind. The advantage with these models is that the Schmidt-Cassegrain design allows high aperture in a much more compact body. Is LT127 a better choice? I'll be observing from my front/backyard, which is in a location with a Bortle scale of 4 (rural/suburban transition). Neptune and Uranus will be barely visible. The 102 refractor will have CA on bright objects, while the 130 reflector will need (regular?) Get the 130. My alt adjust is pretty over tight as well. It's siblings, though, 80AZ , 102AZ, and 130AZ, are much . The optical quality is good for a telescope of this type, but for planetary observing a different instrument would be preferable, such as the 130 mm reflector in the same range. The StarSense has an Aperture of 102mm, a focal length of 650mm resulting in a focal ratio of just under f/6.5. As for other key specifications, dx 102az has a focal ratio of 6.5. As for other key specifications, dx 102az has a focal ratio of 6.5. As for the weight, when fully assembled it comes in at a very portable 6.44kg so you or anyone thats even younger shouldnt have too much of a problem moving it around or even storing it, whether it be at the home or for whenever you decide to take it to an area with minimal light pollution. So, which one is better between Celestron Starsense explorer dx 102az vs 130az? $449.95. Overall The StarSense Explorer 102AZ is very competent refractor telescope, thats potable, easy to set up, has solid optics and decent enough in box accessories for the price. Thats why with cx 102az you wont be able to see faint objects. +91-120-406-2000. In terms of which one is right for you, there are two key things to look at it price and size: The fact that the price difference is fairly large actually helps narrow it down as, if you know your budget, you just need to pick what matters to you most: Please let us know if you have any questions by leaving a comment below. It's good environment company employees also good respect Great place to work in dxc technology. Whereas Celestron dx 130az has an aperture of a whopping 130 mm. So, ultraviolet rays or certain types of light wont be visible on it. The Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ telescope is all about the smartphone app used to align it, though it's a more manual affair than you might expect. Great review! It would kill your phone quite fast. Celestron dx 102az on the other hand is not really worth the price. Thanks for the great review! Your email address will not be published. If you compare their size, 130az is quite big and heavy. This StarSense Explorer DX 102 review was written in January 2020, when the scope was first released for $399. Need more information regarding both telescopes? Now, launch the Starsense app on your phone. StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ | Celestron The Celestron dx 102 uses about 240x magnification power. The only major complaint was to do with the inaccuracy of the apps tracking ability, especially when users decided to look further out. a 6" or even 8" dobsonian ( Links on what to expect in different telescope aperture sizes ). DXC Technology | India COAST HX4 Dual-Color Utility Beam LED Clip Light. The downside is that it is heavier and bulkier, so you should think about where you will use it and whether you value power over portability. The Moon looks pretty good, while Mercury and Venus show nothing besides their phases. Any advice would help. $599.95. So, as you can see both telescopes have their strong and weak points.

Fun Things To Do At Boarding School, The Buried Ship Mystery San Francisco, Tri State Auto Liquidators Cash Giveaway, Is Viking Cruises In Financial Trouble, Neighbours Spoilers: Nicolette Baby, Articles C